Introducing The Advisor, a new brief representing the current thinking of The Advisory Firm - your strategic business partners. Here you can gain access to the insights we collect while consulting to many of Melbourne’s leading businesses. The Advisory Firm works closely with Government and Industry to deliver a range of business development programs and strategic funding opportunities. If it’s been a while since you’ve worked with us- take the time to find out more of what we can do for you. Enjoy the first article on the implications of IR reforms.
– Drew Le Grand, TAF Chairman

The Howard Government plans for industrial relations reform are finally here, but what does it mean for your business and the way you operate? The Advisory Firm’s Brett Galvin looks at some of the opportunities and challenges.

Industrial relations reform promises to make the workforce more flexible and business better able to react to market conditions. In practice the reforms move this country closer to the UK and US workplace arrangements that have seen wages fall in some sectors.

Real Changes:
- Employment contracts and agreements have to meet only four basic minimum standards: on annual leave, personal leave, parental leave and working hours
- Negotiation points opened by the changes include overtime and shift penalties
- Federal awards to be cut from 20 to 16 allowable matters
- Australian Industrial Relations Commission's powers dismantled
- A new Fair Pay Commission to set minimum wages, a minimum “safety net” of basic standards, below current community norms
- Businesses of up to 100 workers exempt from unfair dismissal laws
- Probationary period extended from 3 months to 6 months
- Tougher penalties for unlawful strikes and industrial action
- Compulsory secret ballots before strikes
- New rules curbing the right of union officials to enter workplaces
- Independent contractors to be protected from unions
- State powers superseded to create a national industrial system covering 85 per cent of workers
- All agreements will be submitted to the Office of the Employment Advocate and the agreement taking effect from the lodgment date
- Agreements run for a maximum of five years replacing the current three

The process to reform – what will the final outcomes be
Much debate focuses on the decision to exempt companies with up to 100 employees from unfair-dismissal laws, but the key changes are the centralising of industrial relations control away from state awards. This will be a stumbling block for the government and may see the states end up in a federal court, muddying the issues further. Centralisation would also make it easier for a future government to change or reverse the new structure.

The Workforce Effect
One third of the Australian workforce is employed casually, another third self-employed and the final third fitting the full-time employee label, of this third Unions represent around 17% of the private sector workforce.

The emergence of a greater number of casual workers promotes the notion of ‘on demand’ workers. These workers are generally least powerful in their negotiating position because the lack of specialist skills or the hours they seek to work. The real wages and conditions for these and their low skilled full-time colleagues are predicted to decline slowly.

While the IR changes seek to shift negotiation to an individual level, new collective bargaining strategies will rise as it delivers a way to streamline negotiations and produce an equitable pay scheme for a broad base. From a Management point of view this could be the preferred alternative.

Skilled workers will tend to seek the security of larger firms, unwilling to take the risks involved with a smaller entity with the ability to resize at will. Indeed premiums maybe required to attract/keep skilled labor in the small business environment. The net effect is a higher cost for skilled labor; on the upside the 100 employee threshold may not survive the state/federal
negotiations.

The biggest challenge for all enterprises is the increasing number of self-employed contractors, adept at setting their own individual agreements these business owners have skills in demand and understand how their pay is set by market forces.

The New Choices
Managers will find the reforms will reduce hiring and firing costs, increasing the speed and flexibility to test new sales teams or new production teams.

Conversely these reforms will create the perception of a less secure working environment and will affect the operating culture of your business. It will raise cultural points of difference between competing companies and a contentious division between management and employee power.

The proposed changes will cover about 85% of the workforce and arrive in a period of low-unemployment, global competition, greater cultural diversity, and a shift to the service industries.

The new reforms will have little net social effect while the economy remains healthy, indeed the changes seek will strengthen the ability to reconfigure a business faster in terms of wages levels and the workforce assets a business employs.

Managers know a business is not a democracy and these reforms do provide greater powers over those more sensitive to a slowing economy. They require keen thought to the cultural impacts of the reforms choices. People Managers must ensure the workforce pool they employ understand that these reforms provide an opportunity to built more inclusive organisational goals through the individuals involvement in incentive negotiations. Much more than promoting performance through fear of job security - a message the Union movement has spent $9 millions to promoting to your workforce.

How will your business culture be effected? How will you educate your workforce?

Got an idea for next month's cover story? Why not put your vote in

 

The REVIEW :
Industrial Relations Reform -
How Howard’s reforms effect
people Managers - Click Here

The BUZZ:
Part 1 - SEARCH ENGINE MARKETING
First in a series - exploring SEM for Business Intelligence
- Click Here

The POINT and COUNTERPOINT
Does Money Motivate?
- Click Here

The THEORIES REVISITED
Charismatic Leadership
- Click Here

The OBSCURE TRENDS
Streetside Spruiking meets
Group Behaviour
- Click Here

The Advisory Firm
Level 2, 17-19 Queen Street
Melbourne (03) 8610 2400

     
     
         
Search Engine Marketing - Part 1 of 3

How to use Search Engine Marketing to provide your business with intelligence on consumer trends- here we introduce you to the tricks of the trade.

Unheard of two years ago, today it’s the one thing your website deserves. SEM is the process of improving search engines ranking through organic listings, purchasing paid listings and using search engines for business intelligence.

“Optimisation” began soon after consumer research found that you don’t "exist" if you don’t appear in the first 20 search results. It can develop to a point where measurement, trend tracking and conversion rates are significant enough to warrant a full time analyst as on-line consumption has risen upward of 20%+ in the last twelve months for most sectors.

The facts on the shift to on-line consumption:
- 2 out of 3 Australians are now on the internet regularly
(National Office of the Information Economy Australia)
- Business Executives use it as their primary source of research
(GartnerG2 36%)
- Virtual all affluent shopper research online before buying
(Neilson Research 90%+)
- Australian’s do over 7 million searches a day on Google alone
Source: our friends at exa.com

Search engines gather a vast amount of data about business and consumer activity every
day. The first stage is to find the phrases that are best representing your product, which then estimates the traffic available and revenue potential. The best two tools are Word Tracker and Google’s Traffic Estimator; from these you can get quite accurate size and traffic estimates.

In practice a consumer electronic provider found there were more searches for Playstation cheats than for the games themselves. Apart from the obvious optimization opportunity it shows how this company can better support post sale purchases and develop relationships.

You can visit Yahoo! Overture and Google Zeitgeist for further insight into the current trends in your market space.

Paralleling this, pay per click campaigns places small text advertisements on search engines and allows you to bid for your position within these results. Pay per click (PPC) advertisements either appear above or to the right of the search results. In some cases you bid for the search results you wish to appear on, with the highest bid receiving the best placement. Whilst high rankings offer the best value performance, pay per click provides a perfect compliment allowing you to target an unlimited number of keywords.

Website content optimization is the final jewel of SEM. Your site must direct a diverse set of visitors to immediately find the compelling information they seek. You know from experience if you cannot find what you are looking for in the first 10 secs/2 clicks, you move on. Therefore your traffic investment gets wasted at the front door. Website analytics, accessibility reviews and user scenario analysis; assists to design an exciting consumer experience. Search engine rankings also improve with frequent updates, more hyperlinks between web pages, and more content.

In the current environment who are the best performers? What is the most popular search phrase for the past few months? “Paris Hilton.” Her name generates around 230,000 searches per day (source: WordTracker,) but it’s too late to conjure up Paris Hilton related offerings, alas there are already 4 million+ web pages containing the phrase “Paris Hilton.”
Next Month:
Part 2: SEO Future Applications

Like to get a free article on online marketing tactics? Send a quick e-mail

       

Return to the top menu - click here

 

       
Point: Money Motivates Absolutely

The importance of money as a motivator has been consistently downgraded by most
behavioral scientists. They prefer to point out the value of challenging jobs, goals,
participation in decision making, feedback, cohesive work groups and other non-monetary factors as stimulation to employee motivation. We will argue otherwise here- that money is the
crucial incentive work motivation. As a medium of exchange, it is the vehicle by which employees can buy the numerous need-satisfying things they desire. Further, money also performs the function of a scorecard, by which employees assess the value that the organisation places on their services and by which employees can compare their value to others.

Money’s value as a medium of exchange is obvious. People may not work only for money, but take the money away and how many people would come to work? For most of the workforce, a regular pay cheque is absolutely essential in order to meet their basic physiological needs. As equity theory suggests, money has symbolic value in addition to its exchange value. We use pay as the primary outcome against which we compare our inputs to determine if we are being treated equitably. That an organisation pays one executive $80,000 and another $95,000 means more than the latter’s earning $15,000 a year more. It is a message, from the organisation to both employees of how much it values the contribution of each.

In addition to equity theory, both reinforcement and expectancy theories attest to the value of money as a motivator. In the former, if pay is contingent on performance, it will encourage employees to high levels of effort. Consistent with expectancy theory, money will motivate to the extent that it is seen as being able to satisfy an employee’s personal goals and is perceived as being dependent upon performance criteria.

The best case for money as a motivator is a review of studies done by Edwin Locke. Locke looks at four methods of motivating employee performance: money, goal-setting, participation in decisions, and redesigning jobs to give more challenge and responsibility. He found that the average improvement from money was 30 per cent; goal-setting 16%; participation only 1% and job design 17%. Moreover, every study Locke reviewed that used money as a motivator resulted in some improvement to performance. Such evidence demonstrates that money may not be the only motivator, but it is the most important. The challenge lies in the cost benefit of the added performance and the extra payment that is required to capture this for your business.

The Counterpoint: Money does not motivate most employees today

Money can motivate some people under some conditions. So the issue isn’t really whether or not it does motivate, the question is whether it motivates for consistent high performance. The answer is no.

For money to motivate an employee’s performance, certain conditions must be met. First, money must be important to the employee. Second, it must be perceived by the individual as being a direct reward for performance. Third, the marginal amount of money offered for performance must be perceived by the employee as being significant. Finally, management must have the discretion to reward high performers with more money. Let’s looks at each of these conditions.

Money is not important to all employees. High achievers, for instance, are intrinsically motivated. Money should have little impact on these people. Similarly, money is relevant to those employees with strong lower-level needs; but for most of the work force, their lower order needs are substantially satisfied.

Money would motivate if employees perceived a strong link between performance and rewards in organisations. Unfortunately, pay increases are far more often determined by community pay standards, an index and the current or future performance of the organisation. For money to motivate the average performer, the money must be significant. In practice it is rarely so. For instance a high performance employee currently earning $30,000 a year is given a $200 a month pay rise. Another employee who is an average performer may receive a pay rise of half of that. The net difference in their weekly pay cheques is less than $20. How much motivation is there in knowing that if you work really hard you’re going to end up with $15 a week more? For a large number of people it is not much.

Our last point relates to the degree of discretion that managers have in being able to reward high performers. Where unions exist, that discretion is close to nil. Pay is determined through job title, pay grade and seniority, not level of contribution. So no matter how well or poorly an employee’s performance a range is set for rewards. In most organisations, managers have very little discretion with which they can reward their high performing employees.

So money might be theoretically capable of motivating employees, but most managers aren’t given enough flexibility to do much about it.

Do you think Money motivates? Have your say - click here

       

Return to the top menu - click here

 

       
      Charismatic Leadership

This lifted itself out of the Great man/woman theories of leadership, proposing that people working for charismatic leaders are motivated to exert extra work effort and, because they like their leaders express greater satisfaction.

There is an increasing body of knowledge to back up the effect, Canadian’s Conger and
Kanungo are one of the latest to study this leadership phenomenon.
They developed a set of seven common traits which appear in charismatic leaders:

1. A Vision
This is an idealized goal that proposes a future better than the status quo. The greater the disparity between the idealized goad and the status quo, more likely followers will attribute extraordinary vision to the leader.

2. Ability to articulate the vision
They are able to clarify and state the vision in terms that are understandable to others.
This articulation demonstrates an understanding of the followers’ needs and, hence acts
as a motivating force.

3. Strong convictions about the vision
Charismatic leaders are perceived as being strongly committed, and willing to take on high personal risk, incur high costs and engage in self-sacrifice to achieve their vision.

4. Self-confidence
They have complete confidence in their judgment and ability

5. Perceived as being a change agent
Charismatic leaders are perceived as agents of radical change rather than as caretakers
of the status quo.

6. Behavior that is out of the ordinary
Those with charisma engage in behavior that is perceived as being novel, unconventional and counter to norms. When successful, these behaviors evoke surprise and admiration
in followers.

7. Environmental Sensitivity
These leaders are able to make realistic assessments of the environmental constraints
and resources needed to bring about change.

These characteristics all seem to follow a leader’s commitment to evoke and lead change, while acting to motivate follower to step out of their current routines and to positively approach new ways of working.

Is there a theory we should revisit on your behalf click here to submit your ideas

       

Return to the top menu - click here

 

       
 

Notice how a small crowd develops into a larger crowd as more people push to see what’s going on? We see it everywhere, at the football, at the scene of an accident, or more importantly in a retail setting. How too take advantage of it?

Walking down a prominent shopping strip in Melbourne yesterday I noticed a well dressed man looking into retail shop’s window. Stopping to observe, it was apparent that all the street traffic gave more attention than normal to the window, purely because one person found something interesting. A number of women then went into the shop. As it turns out the man was the shop owner, cleverly using this device to focus consumer attention.

What can this mean for retailers? This human enigma is useful for raising marketing
awareness. Logically if small crowds attract larger crowds- then create a small crowd, even pay for it. Retail staff could find their duties will soon include standing outside and looking in or spruiking the virtues of the store with ad hoc on street performances.

In the real world consumers do make decisions using the need for affiliation as motivation. If a lady sees another of a similar age or aspirational class wearing a new style of scarf, she naturally develops a need for a similar possession to reinforce her representation in the same group. Fashion is prima face evidence for this, also look to BMW and technology.

You maybe aware that shopping coaches have been on the increase, a device which uses aspirational looking idle shoppers to seemingly inadvertently provide advice or ‘coaching’ to others to reinforce a choice or purchase decision. They may even appear to buy a similar product too. The lingering shopper will of course be paid by the retailer. It also can help if this unidentified shopper is of the opposite sex and it is not unknown for coaches using aspirational profiles to involve themselves in large purchases like motor vehicles and housing.

In the end consumers want someone to react, enjoy and appear to consume the way they do. These devices often provide much needed relevance and context to a shopper’s decision making process.

Online Implications
Forrester Research (2005) found that in Europe, more than 50% of online customers of
electronic products checked product reviews, and 30% actually bought because of an online based review. Hint: find positive consumer review and link your product site to it. Amazon boasts over 6 million consumer derived product reviews, it knows that click through and conversion rates are much higher using these tactics and see that it generates greater opportunity to cross sell and up sell.

People who read this story also liked....

 
         

Any feedback or topic suggestions most welcome - click here

 

Unsubscribe Information
lIf you wish not to receive further Editions of The Advisory Firm Newsletter please click here and you will automatically be removed
.

www.theadvisoryfirm.com (03) 8610 2400